Franklin Templeton: The Long View: A unique cycle

CONTRIBUTORS | Jeffrey Schulze, CFA Head of Economic and Market Strategy

Key takeaways

• The distinct nature of the current economic cycle appears to have tripped up many traditional recession indicators. Several leading indicators have improved over the last six months, including an upgrade of the ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard to yellow from red.
• Longer-term shifts such as increased use of fiscal stimulus throughout the economic cycle have helped boost activity over the past few years. Looking ahead, easier lending standards and a pickup in housing activity should help power the economy to a soft landing.
• After a period of historical market concentration, we believe the superior earnings growth of the Magnificent Seven is expected to converge toward the market average over the next two years.¹ This could spark a leadership rotation and broader market participation among the remaining stocks in the S&P 500 as well as small caps.

Current expansion shares little in common with history

Billionaire investor Carlos Slim once famously opined, “With a good perspective on history, we can have a better understanding of the past and present, and thus a clear vision of the future.” While each economic cycle is unique, they share common elements that can help strategists construct a better mosaic on what to expect moving forward. However, as we progress from a (hopefully) once in a lifetime global pandemic, it has become clear there are more differences between the current economic expansion and history than previously perceived. These divergences have driven an incredibly robust economy over the past two years despite many normally reliable recessionary indicators pointing to an impending downturn. While we remain wary of becoming complacent given numerous risks that abound, the current cycle stands out given the improvement of several leading macroeconomic indicators over the last six months.

One such measure comes from the housing market, which typically moves in tandem with the economy but appears to have decoupled since the pandemic—an unusual dynamic that has only occurred twice before in the 1960s and the mid-1990s. Construction activity experienced a downturn from early 2021 through mid-2023, even as the economy grew rapidly. The current decoupling has seen a unique combination of high prices (largely due to low inventories) but dwindling activity as supply chain bottlenecks and high interest rates weighed on construction. Importantly, housing activity expanded in the second half of last year and this strength appears poised to continue with mortgage rates stabilizing and sentiment measures such as the NAHB Housing Market Index survey of homebuilders bottoming.

Another leading indicator showing recent improvement is the Federal Reserve’s quarterly Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey (SLOOS), which is showing meaningfully less tightening in lending standards for both commercial and industrial (C&I) and commercial real estate (CRE) loans. Although these measures are not yet back into loosening territory, the recent improvement dampens downside risk from restrictive bank lending. Further, we believe investors may be underappreciating the programs the Federal Reserve (Fed) unveiled during last year’s regional banking crisis that prevented the crisis from intensifying and leading to a recession.

Exhibit 1: Lending Standards Getting Better

Gray shading represents recessions. Data as of Feb. 5, 2024, latest available as of March 31, 2024. Sources: Macrobond, Federal Reserve.

The ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard has also seen substantial improvement over the past six months, with five underlying indicators improving along with the overall reading. While there were no indicator changes this month, the overall trend remains encouraging and there has been additional progress beneath the surface.

Exhibit 2: ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard

Data as of March 31, 2024. Sources: BLS, Federal Reserve, Census Bureau, ISM, BEA, American Chemistry Council, American Trucking Association, Conference Board, and Bloomberg. The ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard was created in January 2016. References to the signals it would have sent in the years prior to January 2016 are based on how the underlying data was reflected in the component indicators at the time.

It isn’t just the dashboard that has been on the upswing recently. Last month the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index saw its first positive monthly print end a run of 23 consecutive negative readings. This index tends to lead economic activity and has never previously fallen for this long (or by this amount) without a recession materializing. However, the unique nature of the current economic cycle appears to have tripped up many traditional recession indicators.

For example, many consumers have been insulated from higher mortgage rates given a shift toward fixed rate mortgages following the 2007-2009 crisis. The same can be said for corporate America, where interest payments tend to rise (pressuring margins) alongside Fed tightening campaigns and which often occur late in the economic cycle. However, many companies locked in their borrowing at low fixed rates following the pandemic, and net interest expense has actually dropped—aided by higher returns on corporate cash—over the past few years, despite the Fed’s aggressive hiking campaign. Overall, corporate balance sheets are in good shape, which has so far resulted in less of a need to cut costs (and jobs) compared to past cycles.

Exhibit 3: Large Companies Are Locked In

*US Nonfinancial Corporate Business, Net Interest and Miscellaneous Payment, Transactions Divided by Nominal Gross Domestic Product (USD). Gray shading reflects recessionary periods. Data as of March 28, 2024, latest available as of March 31, 2024. Sources: Macrobond, Federal Reserve, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

Another key economic difference relative to history has been the role of fiscal stimulus. Typically, budget deficits decrease as the economy expands, needing less support, while policymakers deliver stimulus during tougher times often accompanied by rising unemployment. However, the paradigm appears to have shifted around the midpoint of the last economic cycle, with a larger deficit accompanying a healthy economy with a low and declining unemployment rate. This has likely negated many of the headwinds created by tighter monetary policy both in the late 2010s and over the past two years. Looking forward, the fiscal impulse is likely to shrink, but not evaporate, this year, as the Employee Retention Credit payments to small businesses should re-start in late spring alongside modest increases in the federal budget.

Exhibit 4: Huge Deficit, Low Unemployment?

As of March 31, 2024. Sources: BLS, BEA, NBER, U.S. Treasury, Bloomberg.

While a soft landing has been our base case for the past few months, we believe the chance of a recession is higher than the consensus view. Nevertheless, equity investors remain sanguine that a soft landing will come to pass and keep the bull market alive.

On that note, we are encouraged by the market’s behavior so far this year. One development that bodes well for the health of the rally is that the Magnificent Seven stocks are trading less as a monolith than they did in 2023—a sign the market is re-focusing on fundamentals. In fact, three of the seven members lagged the S&P 500 Index in the first quarter, with two of them suffering losses. In our view, this differentiation bodes well for investors who can discern what has been embedded into these stocks and whether earnings will come through to justify current valuations.

Exhibit 5: The Divergent 7

Data as of March 26, 2024, latest available as of March 31, 2024. Source: FactSet, S&P. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

It is important to note that the run for the Magnificent Seven has been underpinned by superior EPS growth at a time when the broader market has been delivering lackluster results. However, we believe the advantage of superior fundamentals is expected to narrow substantially in 2024 and even further in 2025. We believe this could be the catalyst for a more durable rotation that sees the other 493 stocks in the S&P 500 increase participation in a broadening market environment, along with small cap stocks.

Exhibit 6: Mag 7 Advantage Dissipating

Data as of March 31, 2024. Sources: FactSet, Russell, S&P. There is no assurance that any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results

The Magnificent Seven and by extension the S&P 500, at 21x next-12-months EPS, are trading at extended valuations. Many investors sitting on cash may be nervous about re-entering an expensive market. However, comparing the market valuation today to history is a bit like comparing apples to oranges due to changes in market composition as well as fundamentals. The S&P 500 has a less volatile earnings stream, less financial leverage and greater profitability than in decades past, all of which support higher multiple, in our view. Some of this is due to changes in corporate behavior, but some can also be attributed to shifts in the makeup of the index itself. Today the S&P 500 has less weight in more volatile, asset-intensive cyclical sectors that tend to trade at lower P/Es and more weight in defensive and growth sectors that tend to trade at higher valuations.

Exhibit 7: Index Composition Supports Higher P/Es

As of March 31, 2024. Sources: Piper Sandler, FactSet, S&P.  For illustrative purposes only and not reflective of the performance or portfolio composition of any Franklin Templeton fund. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results

One additional potential driver of higher multiples is a more flexible Fed that has shifted to using its balance sheet as a policy tool in the wake of the global financial crisis. By employing an expanded toolkit to short-circuit budding crises—such as was done for regional banks last year—the Fed has proven successful in reducing the odds of recessions. A nimbler and faster-responding Fed reduces recessionary tail risks, which should theoretically increase multiples, because the probabilities assigned to recessions and their accompanying earnings declines have been lowered.

In short, we believe historical valuation analysis may not be as helpful as in the past. Just like the unique economic cycle, we may well be in the midst of a unique valuation regime. This isn’t to say the market is cheap, and a period of consolidation would hardly come as a surprise after the equity rally over the past five months. However, long-term investors should take some comfort from the fact that the S&P 500 achieved its first new all-time high in over a year in January, along with several more during the course of the quarter. While all-time highs may incite fear—asking how much better can things get—history shows that deploying capital at peaks has overall led to better performance than deploying capital when the markets are lower on a 1-, 3-, and 5-year basis since 1989 (see Exhibit 8 below).

Exhibit 8: Don’t Be Afraid of All-Time Highs

Data as of March 27, 2024, reflective of the period from Sept. 1989 - present. Latest available as of March 31, 2024. Sources: Macrobond, S&P.

With economic indicators continuing to improve and recession risks further ebbing, we believe investors would be best served by focusing on areas of recent relative underperformance such as the S&P 493 and small caps, segments where improving earnings outlooks and less stretched valuations could fuel upside in a soft landing scenario.

Endnote

1. Magnificent 7 data refers to the following set of stocks: Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Meta (META), Apple (AAPL), Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL), Nvidia (NVDA), and Tesla (TSLA). There is no assurance that any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized.
    

Definitions

The ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard is a group of 12 indicators that examine the health of the U.S. economy and the likelihood of a downturn.

The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 stocks that is generally representative of the performance of larger companies in the U.S.

S&P 493 is known as the S&P 500 Index excluding the seven technology stocks (Magnificent Seven).

The Magnificent Seven stocks are Amazon.com (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL), Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA) and Tesla (TSLA). 

The Federal Reserve Board (Fed) is responsible for the formulation of U.S. policies designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments

The global financial crisis refers to the economic disruption that followed the collapse of prominent investment banks in 2007-2008, marked by a general loss of liquidity in the credit markets and declines in stock prices.

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is an economic statistic which measures the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time.

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) is an association of purchasing and supply management professionals, which conducts regular surveys of its membership to determine industry trends.

Earnings per share (EPS) is the portion of a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock. An index EPS is an aggregation of the EPS of its component companies.

Price-to-Earnings Ratio is calculated by dividing a company’s share price by its trailing 12-month earnings-per-share (EPS) and also excludes companies with zero or negative earnings.

The Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey (SLOOS) is a quarterly survey, conducted by the Federal Reserve, of up to 80 large domestic banks and 24 branches of international banks.

WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.

Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. Large-capitalization companies may fall out of favor with investors based on market and economic conditions. Small- and mid-cap stocks involve greater risks and volatility than large-cap stocks.

Fixed-income securities involve interest rate, credit, inflation and reinvestment risks; and possible loss of principal. As interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities falls.

International investments are subject to special risks including currency fluctuations, social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets.

Commodities and currencies contain heightened risk that include market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions and may not be suitable for all investors.

US Treasuries are direct debt obligations issued and backed by the “full faith and credit” of the US government. The US government guarantees the principal and interest payments on US Treasuries when the securities are held to maturity. Unlike US Treasuries, debt securities issued by the federal agencies and instrumentalities and related investments may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the US government. Even when the US government guarantees principal and interest payments on securities, this guarantee does not apply to losses resulting from declines in the market value of these securities.